Why lr for burn patients

Although since the adoption of weight and injury-size based formulas for resuscitation, multiple organ dysfunction and death caused by inadequate resuscitation has become uncommon [ 10 ]. The consequences of excessive resuscitation and fluid overload are as deleterious as those of under-resuscitation: pulmonary oedema, myocardial oedema, conversion of superficial into deep burns, elevated compartment pressures with the need for fasciotomies in unburned limbs and abdominal compartment syndrome , acute respiratory distress syndrome, and multiple organ dysfunction [ 11 ].

In the UK, burns fluid resuscitation practice has undergone considerable change over the last decade. Changes in the protocols for burn resuscitation have been documented from predominantly colloid-based resuscitation in the early part of the last decade to crystalloid-based resuscitation more recently [ 1 ], [ 3 ], [ 4 ].

This suggested that burn unit practice in the UK and Ireland is moving into line with that used in the United States [ 4 ]. In , the Cochrane Injuries Group report questioned the appropriateness of using albumin in critically ill patients, particularly those with burn injuries [ 13 ].

This shift may have been influenced by national guidelines, the growing influence of ATLS, and by negative publicity surrounding the use of albumin resulting from Cochrane reviews [ 3 ], [ 12 ], [ 13 ], [ 14 ].

There may also be other theoretical reasons why colloid has decreased in popularity, such as its possible contribution to pulmonary oedema following resuscitation [ 1 ], [ 15 ]. Given this relatively recent change in practice, we aimed to establish whether this trend towards crystalloid had continued, and also to gather further data describing practice in the UK and Ireland. The telephone questionnaire ensured that the identity of the member of staff responding was clear, and by targeting senior nursing staff administering burn care, this data gives an accurate impression of exactly what resuscitation is administered to burns patients.

However, it was interesting to note that hospitals had recently switched between formulae in both directions, not just from Muir and Barclay to Parkland. The fact that these formulae only guide resuscitation is clear from the substantial proportion of hospitals over a third that routinely stray from the calculation and from the large proportion using at least urine output, if not invasive monitoring, to guide volume adjustments.

Whilst it is appreciated that both under and over resuscitation are detrimental, urine output as a measure of resuscitation may not provide sensitive or specific monitoring and may not necessarily achieve the best prevention of organ dysfunction either [ 1 ], [ 16 ], [ 17 ], [ 18 ]. There are no level I or II publications to guide the choice of resuscitation fluid in the burned patient [ 14 ], [ 19 ], [ 20 ].

Two principles are essential, first that the least amount of fluid necessary to maintain adequate organ perfusion should be given, and second, that the volume infused should be continually titrated to avoid both under- and over-resuscitation [ 21 ]. Initial fluid choice followed the choice of formula in general. The only colloid used throughout was albumin, in comparison to German data, where starches have grown in popularity [ 22 ].

A rationale for switching resuscitation fluids, to attempt to minimise oedema by introducing a colloid once capillary permeability starts to improve is not a new concept [ 23 ]. This is fewer than previously reported, and interestingly, equal numbers switch from crystalloid to colloid, as supported by this rationale, as switch from colloid to crystalloid.

Other physiological signs should be regularly assessed and recorded including heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate in addition to other signs of end-organ perfusion such as capillary refill time, core-peripheral temperature gap and conscious level. Blood tests such as acid-base balance, lactate and haemoatocrit may give further useful information.

ICUs have sophisticated monitoring devices with variable invasiveness, leading some to suggest that resuscitation volumes can be targeted towards normalising cardiac pre-load. Studies on adults and children have failed to confirm the benefits of additional fluid administered in this pre-load driven approach with invasive hemodynamic monitoring [ 24 ], [ 25 ]. Approaches to oral and enteral resuscitation provided a range of responses. Whilst most hospitals provided enteral feeding for burns, only a minority routinely used oral or enteral fluids as a formal component of resuscitation.

Furthermore, very few felt that it was effective. An international multicenter observational study studied nutrition practices in intensive care units and found that the mean time to start of enteral nutrition was A major limitation of this study is that it does not describe outcomes for patients resuscitated differently. The design of it could not allow meaningful outcome data to be collected. When reviewing the literature comparing crystalloid and colloids for resuscitation, such as the Cochrane reviews mentioned earlier, it must be borne in mind that these reviews are not specific to burns, and thus will have limited applicability.

Indeed, obtaining such outcome data for burns may not be a straightforward task. Endpoints such as mortality will be influenced by various confounding variables when treating burns patients, of which fluid resuscitation is just one, and also by case mix at hospitals with different levels of expertise. Even assessing adequacy of resuscitation depends on a correct, sensitive and specific parameter being measured and as discussed, common parameters such as urine output may not be the most appropriate.

Despite this, variation such as ongoing changes from crystalloid to colloid and vice versa, as continues to occur, and a range of different approaches to changing fluids during the resuscitation period suggest that a consensus of expert opinion may be useful, especially for guiding hospitals that treat major burns relatively infrequently. In conclusion, crystalloid resuscitation remains the most popular in the United Kingdom and Ireland. However, given the variation in practice demonstrated here, and the limitations of the evidence base underpinning fluid resuscitation, it is time to seek a consensus of expert opinion to guide fluid resuscitation.

National Center for Biotechnology Information , U. Journal List Ger Med Sci v. Ger Med Sci. Published online Jun Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Received Feb 26; Revised May You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine the thermal injury fluid resuscitation protocols at intensive care units ICUs in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Keywords: burns, fluid resuscitation, colloids, crystalloids. Introduction The burned patient is at risk of hypovolaemia, which may progress to organ failure, and even death. Open in a separate window. Table 1. Comparison of Muir and Barclay and Parkland formulas for burns resuscitation. Methods A telephone questionnaire was designed to obtain regarding fluid resuscitation protocols. Results All 64 plastic surgery units were contacted. Figure 1. Percentage TBSA burn at which resuscitation started in units treating adults.

Figure 2. They performed no simulation or replacement of missing data in both cases. Data keeper performed a paired comparison of the baseline and post resuscitation levels of sodium, potassium, chloride, albumin, and total protein when both values were available. He used a paired t-test whenever data followed a normal distribution. If the data deviated from the normality assumption, data keeper used non-parameteric tests.

Team used Stat Tools, Version 6. In all univariate analyses, the team a priori considered a p-value of less than 0. However, data analyst determined that multivariate analyses were not possible. One hundred and sixty two patients were referrals from other hospitals and did not receive RL during shock period. Another one hundred and thirty nine patients had their laboratory investigations done outside the time windows defined a priori. We present the baseline and demographic characteristics of the patients and burn injuries in Table 1.

Eighty percent of the patients were more than 12 years old and most were males almost ratio. These and other types of burns encountered in this cohort are.

Figure 1. Total number of patients admitted to the burn unit and numbers of excluded cases with their reasons. Table 1. Cohort baseline characterisitics. Electrolytes assessed in the study were sodium, potassium and chloride. Twenty one patients The number increased to 55 patients One patient. Figure 2. Types causes of burns encountered in cohort in this study in percentages. Pre- and post-sodium levels are presented in Figure 3. Overall, there was a statistically significant decrease in sodium levels post-resuscitation.

Thirty patients had hypokalaemia at the time of admission The num- ber reduced to 16 patients by the end of resuscitation period Four patients were admitted with initial hyperkalaemia 3.

Pre- and post-potassium levels are presented in Figure 4. No patients had hypochloraemia in this study. However, 39 patients had hy- perchloremia Out of 82 patients assessed available data for albumin level, 23 patients had hypoalbuminaemia at the time of admission The number markedly increased to 79 patients by the end of the resuscitation period None of the patients had hyperalbuminaemia in our study. We assessed total protein in blood in 81 patients with available data.

While the initial reading of patients showed that 33 of them had hypoproteinaemia No patients had hyperprotinaemia in our study. Figure 5 and Figure 6 summarize the levels found on admission and post-resuscitation for albumin and total protein, respectively. Figure 3. Pre- and post-sodium levels using two-tailed paired t-test. Figure 4. Pre- and post-potassium levels using two-tailed paired t-test. Figure 5. This study is the first in GCC and MENA regions, to the best of our knowledge, that demonstrates that management of burn patients in the shock phase with.

Figure 6. There is a limited number of up to date literature directly investigating the effect of resuscitation of burn patients with lactated ringers LR in terms of electrolytes balance. These amounts reflect those found in blood, except for sodium, and would prevent hyperchloremic acidodsis in our study chloride levels were maintained as well as ensure patients remain in the normal potassium level range.

These solutions, however, fail to control sodium levels in such patients and are usually associated with hyponatremia. On the other hand, studies in animal models show that addition of sodium containing mixtures such as sodium pyruvate, and sodium butyrate improve hemodynamic stability and organ functions in burn patients [24] [25].

Therefore, it would be important to see if these effects would be achieved by modifying the current recommended solutions such that they contain more sodium. The original Parkland formula as was introduced by Baxter in recommended the use of colloids in the second 24 hours post burn [3] [27]. On his review paper of different formulas, Greenhalgh mentioned that this recommendation is not usually followed [28].

Blumetti et al. Still, the use of colloids albumin and dextran during the initial resuscitation period is controversial. Additionally, from our experience, deaths that may occur at a later stage may be due to complications such as septic shock and hence albumin may need to be reconsidered for these patients in burn shock phase.

It follows that a significant number of our patients may have been at risk of passing away even though none actually expired in the burn shock phase. Furthermore, it is clear in our study that the progressive decline in albumin and protein levels was dramatic and occurred in the entire co- hort and all other subgroups analyzed.

Consequently, we believe that albumin in addition to current recommended crystalloids may be important for these burn patients although this may need to be confirmed in controlled studies.

Our study is stand-alone to the best of our knowledge in this area of practice which gave a close zoom in at the baseline and post-resuscitation levels of electrolytes, albumin and proteins following RL. Our data consist of a cohort admitted at the major burn unit in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. Unfortunately, we did not have a comparator arm to contrast the levels with patients who receive albumin in the burn shock phase. This is an important limitation in our study which other groups has to overcome by performing controlled investigations.

For the sake of comparison, contrast our post-resuscitation mean of albumin of Lack of clarity as to the optimal fluids to use enabled us to have these different cohorts and hence made it possible to demonstrate the great differences in effect they have on post-resuscitation electrolytes and proteins levels.

Abstract It is a widely accepted fact that severe fluid loss is the greatest problem faced following major burn injuries. Keywords: Severe burns, burn shock, fluid resuscitation. Pathophysiology of burn shock Major burn injuries result in an area of necrotic zone, beneath this lies the zone of stasis and results in release of inflammatory mediators e.

Brooke formula Initial 24 hours : RL solution 1. Modified Brooke Initial 24 hours : No colloids. Formulas developed for children The formulas developed for children[ 35 ] are as follows. Choice of fluid The ideal burn resuscitation is the one that effectively restores plasma volume, with no adverse effects.

Isotonic crystalloids Crystalloids are readily available and cheaper than some of the other alternatives. Hypertonic solutions The importance of sodium ions in the pathophysiology of burn shock has been emphasised in some previous studies. Colloids Leakage and accumulation of plasma proteins outside the vascular compartment contributes substantially to oedema formation. Considerations for effective resuscitation Antioxidant therapy The membrane lipid peroxidation and ROS are the main components of burn shock.

Opioids and fluid resuscitation Opioids have been the mainstay of pain control in burn patients. Monitoring All resuscitation formulas are meant to serve as guides only. Acute renal failure and dialytic support in severe Burns ARF is a severe complication of burns, which occurs in 0.

Options The addition of colloid-containing fluid following burn injury, especially after the first 12—24 hours postburn, may decrease the overall fluid requirements. Tricklebank S. Modern trends in fluid therapy for burns. Current status of burn wound pathophysiology. Clin Plast Surg. Substance P levels and neutral endopeptidase activity in acute burn wounds and hypertrophic scar.

Plast Reconstr Surg. Berger MM. Antioxidant micronutrients in major trauma and burns: Evidence and practice. Nutr Clin Pract. The role of oxidative stress in adult critical care. Free Radic Biol Med. Reducing deaths due to oxidative stress The REDOXS Study : Rationale and study design for a randomized trial of glutamine and antioxidant supplementation in critically-ill patients. Proc Nutr Soc. Moore FD. The body-weight burn budget. Basic fluid therapy for the early burn.

Surg Clin North Am. Underhill F. The significance of anhydremia in extensive surface burn. A clinical randomized study on the effects of invasive monitoring on burn shock resuscitation.

Gastrointestinal fluid resuscitation of thermally injured patients. J Burn Care and Res. American Burn Association practice guidelines burn shock resuscitation.

Burn resuscitation. Resuscitation of thermal injuries in the United Kingdom and Ireland. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. Regional and Institutional variation in burn care. J Burn Care Rehabil. Control of intermediary metabolism in childhood with special reference to hypoglycaemia and growth hormone. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. Warden GD. Burn shock resuscitation. World J Surg. Baxter C. Fluid volume and electrolyte changes in the early post-burn period. Clin Plastic Surg. Pruitt BA. Fluid and electrolyte replacement in the burned patient.

Is supra-Baxter resuscitation in burn patients a new phenomenon? Controversies in fluid resuscitation for burn management: Literature review and our experience. Injury Int J Care injured. Physiological response to crystalloid resuscitation of severe burns. Ann NY Acad Sci. Baxter CR. Guidelines for fluid resuscitation. J Trauma. Fluid resuscitation, burn percentage, and physiologic age. Barry P. Thermal, electrical and chemical injuries. Philadelphia: Lippincot-Raven; Kucan JO.

Thermal burns: resuscitation and management. Mastery of plastic and reconstructive surgery. New York: Little Brown; Hypertonic sodium solutions in the treatment of burn shock. Monafo WW. Treatment of burn shock by intravenous and oral administration of hypertonic lactated saline solution.

The treatment of burns: principles and practice. Louis: Warren H Green; The role of concentrated sodium solutions in the resuscitation of patients with severe burns. Salisbury RE. Thermal burns. Plastic surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; The Parkland formula in patients with burns and inhalation injury. Philadelphia: Saunders; Effects on coagulation of intravenous crystalloid or colloid in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. Br J Anaesth.

Haemodilution-induced enhancement of coagulation is attenuated in vitro by restoring antithrombin III to predilution concentrations. Anaesth Intens Care. In vivo effect of haemodilution with saline on coagulation: a randomized controlled trial. Sakallioglu AE, Haberal M.